Building a PLN Ain’t That Easy
Below you will find a poll/question and the results to date of that question. I have been thinking about this for some time now. The title, PLN, or Personal/Professional Learning Network, has been in circulation for some time now and it represents one’s support network beyond the physical, face-2-face relationships that we typically have within our daily reach. It represents the potential power one can tap into when harnessing a much more global and virtual network of like-minded and often expert groups. Tools such as microblogs (Twitter/Plurk), blogs, social networks (Ning, LinkedIn, Facebook) , backchannel conversations, social bookmarking (Diigo, Delicious), and other social applications (YouTube, SlideShare,…) that allow a community to participate in ideas are all key to building your PLN. However, I think we have sometimes represented the responsiveness (hence, the utility) of one’s PLN a little too simplistically at times. For example, the message may come across as “embrace these tools, build your PLN, and you will have a wealth of collaborative power. Or, blogging will revolutionize your teaching/learning. Or, use a wiki and the world will come and help you add content/flesh out your ideas. Or, get a Twitter account and your every question will be responded to by a wealth of great folks who will also all want to follow you. Perhaps some of that comes from watching the response that the “super stars” receive when they ask questions, post blog posts, twitter questions, or invite others to contribute in some way. It is just not that easy as it may seem… or as easy as we (I put myself in that boat) have sometimes communicated. Building a PLN is hard work and it requires diligent, active, and participatory excellence. Many times questions may go unanswered. Many times blog posts may receive no commentary. It is one thing to “take” from your PLN. That’s the easy part. It is a totally different thing to have your PLN “give” to – or work for – you. The latter requires a much more significant depth of relationship.
I have noticed that often my own PLN gets an intellectual shot in the arm when I have met folks face to face in various settings. So, I posed the following question. The response was what I suspected. It is far from a representative sample upon which firm conclusions can be drawn, but it does make me think that face to face connections remain critical for learning, networking, building, and sustaining a vibrant PLN. I noticed that many of this year’s NECC attendees mentioned how valuable it was that they were there physically versus simply being a virtual fly on the wall… that the face to face relationships were an essential part for them. I also recall reading some comments by folks who couldn’t attend physically and how much they missed the physical connective experience, myself included.
It is so much more than simply using the tools, isn’t it – just as being an effective teacher is so much more than the new tools one surrounds himself with.
What do you think? What has been your experience? Please contribute to the embedded poll below.


Flickr/ransomtech
Linkedin/StephenRansom
Twitter/ransomtech
YouTube/ransomtech
Del.icio.us/ransomtech